Comments for Untyping

Comment on The University of Untyped by C-Suite 2.0 - BizTechTalk Briefs 08/22/2011 - C-Suite 2.0

C-Suite 2.0 - BizTechTalk Briefs 08/22/2011 - C-Suite 2.0 — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:46:54 +0000

[...] The University of Untyped – Untyping [...]

Comment on Javascript compilation for SBT by Noel

Noel — Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:18:48 +0000

Currently 0.7 but it will be updated to 0.11 soon.

Comment on Javascript compilation for SBT by KajMagnus

KajMagnus — Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:35:10 +0000

Hi Untyped! Is this a plugin for SBT 0.7, or 0.10.x?

Thanks for publishing.

Comment on Smooth Scrolling for Mobile Safari by Miki

Miki — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:04:43 +0000

Great plugin! Exactly what I was looking for. Thanks
However, the sizes and measures don’t change when I change the device’s screen orientation, which is the only thing keeping it apart from being perfect.

Comment on UU and You: Learn Some Opa by Noel

Noel — Fri, 02 Sep 2011 08:01:49 +0000

Indeed. And Linux or Mac OS only. Better install a VM (try VirtualBox) if you run windows.

Comment on UU and You: Learn Some Opa by suheimi

suheimi — Fri, 02 Sep 2011 01:42:15 +0000

required: 64 bit OS

Comment on What is Hacker News Worth? by Noel

Noel — Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:58:35 +0000

Good questions Adam. As stated in the post we got just over a dozen signups (I don’t have the exact figure in front of me). Our normal cost of acquisition is zero. We didn’t plan on promoting Myna till January, as we have a lot of client work right now, and all previous beta testers have been sourced through personal connections. The HN post changed that plan. A signup rate of <1% is fairly poor, so we’ll aim to improve that over time.

Comment on What is Hacker News Worth? by Adam

Adam — Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:09:07 +0000

You should outline some statistics. Other than traffic you didn’t really point out how much it was worth. How many signups did you get from it? What’s your normal cost of acquisition?

Comment on Stop A/B Testing and Make Out Like a Bandit by Nxjlma

Nxjlma — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:59:21 +0000

Took a quick peek: appears to be a testing perspective parallel to the development models like the super-rigid (waterfall) to super-flexible (agile). Of course, a balance is usually the best course.
The article appears to describe A|B as unable to account for the other contextual attributes during testing that may affect it. So, it appears A|B has worst parts of the rigidity of waterfall
and the chaotic ebbs of agile. Here, balance is again called for and that may be what Bandit is made for (but an empirical A|B is an elemental component of the solution). It just augments A|B
with a reactive part and contextual recording part.

Super-reactive/Context = Bandit
Elemental part (once relative context is established) = A|B

Comment on Stop A/B Testing and Make Out Like a Bandit by pbreit

pbreit — Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:56:08 +0000

This sounds like something I want to pursue but am not certain how to actually implement something like this. The references are a bit academic. Do you have any pointers to good implementation information for newbies? Thanks!